What happens – can happen – when a historian looks at literature? What happens – is likely to happen – when the practitioner of a referential discourse, which is what history is believed to quintessentially be, looks at the quintessentially non-referential discourse that literature is? A great deal, comprising diametrically opposite possibilities, can obviously be expected to happen. Without touching upon the range of those possibilities, I shall in my presentation try and share with you something of what happened to me, as a professional historian, following an impulse to go to modern Indian literature for understanding the structure of modern Indian social consciousness. Though I shall mostly deal with literature in colonial India, with which I am relatively better acquainted, I may feel tempted to make some remarks about post-1947 literature as well in order to suggest that the kind of social consciousness that emerged under the colonial impact has continued into our own day.
OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
Projet DELI (13 avril 2016). Séminaire Littératures d’Asie du Sud : Sudhir Chandra (15 avril 2016). Projet DELI. Consulté le 11 décembre 2024 à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/niaf